The Rapture: If and When? - Reggie Kelly
Response
to an unpublished question concerning the Rapture. Previously titled “Difficult
Rapture Questions”
We
certainly believe there is a rapture for the church; the question is when?
In
addition to the resurrection of “the dead in Christ” (1Thes 4:16), all those
who belong to Christ (1Cor 15:23) that survive the final tribulation must also
be ‘changed’ at the last trump (1Cor 15:52). The so-called ‘rapture’ pertains
to the “catching up” of these remaining living believers (1Thes 4:17). This
happens in connection with the change mentioned in 1Cor 15:52. The requirement
for this “change” is based on the principle that Paul establishes in 1Cor
15:50. “Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the
kingdom of God; neither does corruption inherit incorruption” (15:50).
We fully affirm that
a rapture will occur, but not as it is being taught.
So
we fully affirm that a rapture will occur, but not as it is being taught. Those
that teach that the rapture is BEFORE the tribulation (called the “pre-tribulational”
view. ‘Pre’ means before) see it as escape and exemption from the last
persecution, which they confuse with the wrath of God, and point out that
believers are not ‘appointed to wrath’ (1Thes 5:9). There is, of course, a
clear distinction between tribulation and divine wrath. There is a clear
distinction throughout the book of Revelation between the saints endure the
wrath of man and those that are called ‘earth dwellers’ that experience the
wrath of God. Manifestly, there are many saints in the tribulation period that
are not “appointed to wrath,” but this exemption does not require physical
removal from the scene (Lk 21:18; Rev 7:3; 12:6).
We
too believe in the rapture. The difference is that we believe the resurrection
and rapture of the church takes place AFTER the tribulation, at the “last day,”
which we understand as the one and only ‘second’ coming of Christ (see Mt
24:29; Jn 6:39, 44, 54; 11:24; 12:48; Heb 9:28). Therefore, we are called
‘post-tribulationists’ (‘Post’ means after). Both positions recognize the
rapture in some form, but differ significantly concerning its time and purpose.
We
are clear that all those that survive the great tribulation to the point of the
Lord’s return MUST undergo this change, and this ‘catching up’ into the clouds
of glory, in like manner to the Lord’s own ‘taking up’ into the clouds, as
described in Acts 1:11. The question is: Having now been ‘caught up’ into the
air, where do we go from there? This is the question that ‘pre-tribulationists’
will press. Where do the newly resurrected saints abide? What is their
relationship to those that populate the millennial earth? I want to come back
to that question, but first I want to further establish the time of the
rapture.
Notice
that Paul locates the resurrection and rapture “at the last trump” (1Cor
15:52). Jesus also mentions the sounding of “a great trumpet” in connection
with the “gathering together of His elect” (compare Mt 24:31 with 2Thes 2:1).
Now notice that this takes place “immediately AFTER the tribulation of those
days” (Mt 24:29-31). It is evident from Paul’s use of similar language in 2Thes
2:1 that he has this same event in mind. Listen to the language he uses: “Now
we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering
together unto Him,” He continues by adding that ‘that day’ cannot come until
AFTER the Antichrist has been revealed. Listen again to the words of Paul: “Let
no man deceive you by any means. For that day (the ‘Day of the Lord’) shall not
come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed,
the son of perdition” (2Thes 2:2-3).
We can say with
utmost certainty, “Christ CANNOT come today!” The reason is plain.
Therefore,
if Paul says that the ‘day of the Lord’ cannot come until AFTER the Antichrist
has been revealed, how can the rapture be considered an imminent event?
Pretribulationists teach that Christ could come any moment and that nothing by
way of necessary fulfillment stands in the way. They say He might come today.
Well, we may not know when any individual may be called into final judgment,
but we can say with utmost certainty, “Christ CANNOT come today!” The reason is
plain. Paul tells us that the Antichrist must come first.
Both
Testaments treat the ‘Day of the Lord’ as the conclusion to the time of
unequaled trouble. This means the day of the Lord ‘IS’ the post-tribulational
return of Christ. As proof, compare Joel 2:30-31 with Mt 24:29. Notice that the
Lord’s return comes AFTER the darkness that comes AFTER the tribulation. Now
observe that Joel places the darkness immediately BEFORE the day of the Lord.
Do you see that? Examine those passages closely. This is an important
distinction, because it prohibits spreading the ‘day of the Lord’ out to
include the entirety of the tribulation (as in pre trib rapture teaching).
Indeed, all the prophets show that Israel’s deliverance and regeneration takes
place at this time. And the day of the Lord is consistently presented as the
climax to the unequaled time of trouble, a time that Daniel and Revelation
limit to 3 ½ years. Many may not be aware that this is also the time that the
Old Testament faithful are raised (see Dan 12:1-2; Isa 25:8; 26:19; Job 19:25).
[As
an aside, I'd like to point out the importance of Dan 12:1-2 for our view of
the time of Jacob's trouble. This is not the place to show all the reasons, but
this passage is the 'nemesis' (threat or obstruction) to many false
interpretations. For this cause, it is often spiritualized. However, if this is
not a definite reference to the literal resurrection of the literal dead, then
where is there a plainer reference to resurrection to be found that is not
subject to the same dubious procedure? Through such a method, the plain meaning
of language and the author's original intent is effectively vaporized. The
authority of scripture is not questioned, but the end is the same unbelief that
asks "has God really said?" But all the evidence defies
spiritualizing this passage. Notice the similarity of language between Jer 30:7,
Dan 12:1, and Mt 24:21. There can be no doubt that the same event is in view.
Now observe that the time of the unequaled tribulation ends with the
deliverance of Israel in both Jeremiah's and Daniel's prophecy, while in
Matthew the tribulation ends with Christ's return (Mt 24:29-30). Do you see
that? Now notice that the tribulation that ends in Israel's deliverance,
Christ's return, and the resurrection of the righteous happens in connection
with the standing up of Michael. It is noteworthy that we see Michael again in
Rev 12. Here again, the context is the threshold of the final tribulation. This
marks the time that Satan is evicted from heaven and comes down with great rage
because he knows his time is short (Rev 12:12). This 'short time' of Satan's
unrestrained fury is obviously the time of unequaled tribulation, the time of
the Antichrist's final 3 ½ year persecution of the saints and of the woman (Dan
7:25; 9:27; 12:11; Rev 11:2-3; 12:6, 14; 13:5). Here again in John's
apocalypse, the time of the first resurrection that begins the thousand years
is set in relation to the destruction of the Beast (Rev 19:20; 20:4-6), and all
of these events terminate in the 'great day of God Almighty' (compare 16:14, 17
with Ezek 39:8). The same order is observed in Dan 7:11-13, 21-27). Paul
likewise sees the 'Man of Sin' destroyed by the personal appearing of Christ
(2Thes 2:8). So whoever would spiritualize the resurrection in Daniel 12:2 must
spiritualize a great deal besides. Typically, the resurrection in Dan 12:2 is
spiritualized only because it stands in the way of placing the unparalleled
tribulation in 70AD. If the resurrection is literal, then the tribulation is
future, and this is fatal to 'preterism'. If the tribulation is past, then the
deliverance of Daniel's people' must also be past. This denies the evidence for
Israel's future salvation (Ro 11:25-29) in obvious connection with a yet future
tribulation. Such a reckless mission becomes more than exegetically
reprehensible; it becomes morally suspect.]
So
it is clear that Paul shares the perspective of the prophets that depict the
day of the Lord as the terminal point that ends the tribulation with the
deliverance of Israel (Isa 59:19-21; Ro 11:25-29), the resurrection of the dead
(Dan 12:2; Isa 25:8; 26:19), and the destruction of the Antichrist ( 2Thes
2:8). So where does Paul place the resurrection of the church in relationship
to the resurrection of the Old Testament faithful?
It
must not be overlooked, as it was certainly NOT overlooked by Paul, that the
events of the ‘day of the Lord’ happen in connection with a ‘great sound of a
trumpet’ (see Ps 47:5; Isa 27:13; Joel 2:1; Zeph 1:16; Mt 24:31; 1 Cor
15:52-54; Rev 10:7; 11:15). Even pretribulationists must admit that the
resurrection of the OT faithful happens in connection with the trumpet that
sounds the ‘day of the Lord’ (Isa 27:13; Joel 2:1).
How then can any
trumpet sounding an alleged seven years earlier be intelligently called last?
In
light of such evidence, it becomes quite impossible to say that Paul’s ‘last trump’
sounds seven years BEFORE the trumpet that Jesus mentions in connection with
His post-tribulational return (1Cor 15:52; Mt 24:29-31). Undeniably, both
testaments witness to the fact that the ‘day of the Lord’ comes with the “great
sound of a trumpet.” How then can any trumpet sounding an alleged seven years
earlier be intelligently called last? But this is precisely what is being
taught among the larger part of those that believe the tribulation is future
and that Israel (“the natural branches”) has a destiny beyond this present age
(called the ‘futurist view’).
So
we believe that the church is gathered to the Lord by rapture, but only after
the final persecution. This is the Lord’s personal return to destroy the
Antichrist, reveal Himself to Israel, and raise the righteous of both
testaments. It should have been that simple.
There
is one more point that I would like to make in this connection. I’ve not seen
it addressed anywhere else. Remember that we said the prophets make frequent
mention of a trumpet in connection with the day of the Lord. Now with that in
mind, notice a particularly important phrase in Paul’s exposition of the
mystery of the rapture (1Cor 15:50-54). It appears in verse 54.
“So
WHEN this corruptible shall put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put
on immortality, THEN shall be brought to pass the saying that is written,
“Death is swallowed up in victory.”
The
phrase is “then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written.” This is
decisive in showing the background of Paul’s understanding of the time of the
resurrection. ‘The saying’ that Paul has in mind is found in Isa 25:8. Now
notice that Isa 25:8 is set in a very distinct context. It belongs to a section
made up of four chapters that scholars mark off as a unit. It is called “the
little apocalypse of Isaiah.” From the beginning of ch 24 to the end of 27 of
Isaiah, the topic throughout is the ‘day of the Lord’, and concerns itself with
those transitional events that cluster around that day as the terminal point of
Israel’s tribulation.
So
when is the THEN? It is WHEN this corruptible shall put on incorruption.” It is
THEN that the saying (Isa 25:8) is fulfilled, and Paul says this happens ‘at
the last trump’. Now go back and look over the larger context reaching back to
ch 24 and forward to the end of ch 27. In the passages immediately preceding
25:8 (Isa 25:7), you will notice that “the veil is destroyed that covers the
face of all nations.” Before this, there is a poetic description of a wedding
feast on Mount Zion. The entirety of Isaiah’s little apocalypse (24-27)
concerns the time of Israel’s salvation and the final world judgment. The
entire context is undeniably ‘post-tribulational’. In the following chapter
(26), Isaiah announces his own expected resurrection together with the faithful
of Israel (Isa 26:19). Note especially that in ch 27, the surviving remnant of
Israel are “gathered” in connection with the sounding of “the great trumpet”
(Isa 27:13).
Paul’s
application of Isa 25:8 to the time of the church’s resurrection is undeniable
evidence that he identified the time of the church’s resurrection with that of
the Old Testament faithful. This is fatal to the pre trib view, because both
Daniel and Isaiah are very clear that the righteous dead are raised in connection
with Israel ‘s deliverance at the end of the tribulation (Dan 12:1-2, 13; Isa
26:16-21). It was also well known that Israel’s final deliverance at the day of
the Lord would be accompanied by the ‘great sound of a trumpet’ (Joel 2:1; Isa
27:13). So if the adverb “then” means anything, it becomes impossible to place
the resurrection of the church seven years earlier than the event described in
Isa 25:8.
The mystery of the
rapture particularly explains the relationship of living believers to those
that sleep.
Contrary
to pretribulational presuppositions concerning the nature of a New Testament
mystery, we see that Paul’s mystery has a definite relation to OT prophecy. Not
only does it further address the question of the order of the resurrection, it
also solves the problem of the relationship of the resurrected and glorified
redeemed in contrast to those that come to faith on the other side of Christ’s
return. In order to understand the point of Paul’s mystery, it is important to
distinguish between what was and was not a mystery. The time of the
resurrection is not the object of Paul’s mystery; this was understood. As in
1Thes 4:13-17, the mystery of the rapture particularly explains the
relationship of living believers to those that sleep. In 1Cor 15:50-52 the
stress falls on the change that fits the living to participate in resurrection
glory. But this is not all that the mystery of the rapture answers. Paul’s
mystery makes evident that no regenerate survivor of the tribulation will go
unchanged into the millennium. This becomes a significant point of contrast
with the penitent remnant of Israel that are not transformed UNTIL the
appearing of Chirst (compare Isa 59:21; 66:8; Ezek 39:22; Jer 30:7; Dan 12:1;
Zech 12:10; 3:9; with Mt 23:39; Acts 3:21; Ro 11:25-29; Rev 1:7). These go into
the millennium in natural bodies, as do many survivors from among the nations.
From this new beginning, the millennial earth is repopulated.
So
the evidence of the general order of events and the time of the rapture and
resurrection of the church just keeps piling up. For just one more example,
consider Rev 11:15. Here again is the trumpet that sounds the end of the
tribulation and the finishing of the mystery of God (see Rev 10:7), and the
final passing of this world’s dominions over to the Lord and His Christ. Now
observe that this is also the time that the righteous dead are raised and
rewarded (Rev 11:18). The evidence for a post-tribulational rapture of the
church is simply massive and irrefutable. The plain, simple, and
straightforward reading of scripture would never make one a pre
tribulationalist. This is evident since the view was unheard of till modern
times.
Many are unaware of
an alternative to such a disarming and potentially costly error.
Brother,
pray for me. We have work to do. It is by no means equal to the essential
gospel in importance, but there is a need to present our pre-tribulational
brothers with the alternative to what they’ve been taught. Many have never seen
the case for our view, and when any of us are entrusted with anything from the
Lord, it makes us a steward and a debtor. The pre trib rapture is the ‘Trojan
horse’ of the end time that has been smuggled into the evangelical camp (for
such a time as this). It needs to be exposed while it is yet day. I, therefore,
urge my brothers and sisters to count these matters worthy of their study (Prov
15:28; 2Tim 2:15, 25; 1Pet 3:15). The righteous studies to give answer. We want
to help ourselves be prepared to help others. Many are unaware of an
alternative to such a disarming and potentially costly error. As Francis
Schaffer once said, “apologetics (giving an answer) is an enterprise of
Christian compassion.”
Unless
the body of Christ can escape this error in time, much physical life stands to
be lost. This is not to even mention the spiritual shock and the general effect
that such a distortion takes on how we see God’s, His workings and ways. The
same is true of the view that says the great tribulation passed already into
history with the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem (a view called preterism). This
view, no less than the pre trib view, also robs the church of critical
readiness and understanding (Dan 11:33) It is even much more widespread than
pretribulationism, because Roman Catholicism and most of world wide Christendom
subscribes to this view in some form. This is what is called ‘replacement’
theology. In either view, the church is disarmed for what’s coming. Not only
this, but such systems obscure and eclipse the true glory of God that is best
seen in its divinely chosen context (Ro 11:33), and this is the greatest loss
of all.
While
I too can rest in the sovereignty of God, I also know that a lie is always
costly and can exact a heavy toll. That is part of the judgment that is built
right into believing a lie. This happens anytime a believer fails to properly
depend on the Spirit to be their teacher (1Jn 2:27). When we defer these
matters to the so-called experts, we sacrifice a sacred trust, namely, the
“priesthood of every believer”. We defraud ourselves of God’s desire to confide
His secrets to His friends (Gen 18:17; Isa 41:8; Amos 3:7 with Jn 15:15) and to
lead even ‘the least of these’ into all truth.
Where do believers go
after 'meeting' the Lord in the air?
I
said I would return now to the question: Where do believers go after ‘meeting’
the Lord in the air? And what is the purpose of being ‘caught up’? The most
popular view as taught by pretribulationism is that the church goes back to
heaven with Christ to celebrate the ‘marriage supper of the Lamb.’ In their
view, the church is in heaven while the Old Testament saints remain in their
graves for seven more years (Dan 12:1-2). (Academic pre trib scholars actually
teach this). But there is no evidence that Jesus stops in mid air and returns
back to heaven with the church for a seven-year interim.
When
we come to the famous rapture passage (1Thes 4:17), many have pointed out that
the term ‘Parousia’ (coming, presence, or arrival) is used in significant
combination with the Greek noun for ‘a meeting’. This was a technical term in
the Hellenistic culture of the day for the custom of sending an official
delegation out of the city to greet an approaching dignitary and to escort the
royal figure back into the city with great ceremony. For such a momentous
event, advent (epiphany) coins were struck; monuments built, and sacrifice
offered. Sometimes a new era would be dated from the event of the “Parousia” of
the royal personage (Adolph Deismann, “Light from the Ancient East, pg. 68-73).
So, there is no evidence that the saints return with Christ to heaven, but
rather accompany Him in His triumphant return to earth.
“And
his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before
Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst
thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great
valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it
toward the south. And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the
valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye
fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the
Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee” (Zech 14:4-5, see also
Isa 13:3; Joel 3:11; 1Thes 3:13; 4:14; Rev 19:14).
Significantly,
Christ’s ‘day of the Lord’ descent is to the very place of His
post-resurrection ascent (Acts 1:11-12), but the effects of His return are
radically different from His quiet departure.
Before
leaving this subject, I’d like to ask a question that is more than it first
appears: Why is the part of the body of Christ, which survives the final
tribulation, changed at this point in time? The simple and easy answer is that
the dead are raised at Christ’s return. That is true; but there remains the
problem of the resurrection of millennial believers, those saved after the
rapture. Of course, this is no problem at all for those that believe that the
millennium is not literal, that it is only symbolic of the present reign of
Christ and the martyrs from heaven. This view is called ‘a-millennialism’. But
for those that believe that the millennium begins with Christ’s return
(pre-millennialism), there is the problem of the relationship of the
resurrected church to those that do not come to faith until after Christ has
returned. The problem presents itself on the basis of two facts:
Fact
one: The scripture is clear that not only the ‘dead in Christ’, but ‘all’ (not
only some) that truly belong to Christ will be changed at the point of the
Lord’s post-tribulational return. This is clear from many texts (see especially
1Cor 15:23, 52; 1Thes 4:16).
How do we understand
the difference between the saints that are changed at the rapture, and those
that populate the millennial earth in their natural bodies?
Fact
two: The millennium will be populated by many that do not come to faith until
the day of the Lord, which, as we have seen, ends the great tribulation (Isa
59:19-21; 66:8; Jer 30:7, Dan 12:1-2; Ezek 39:22-25, 26-29; Zech 3:9; 12:10; Ro
11:25-29 with Mt 23:39; Acts 3:21). Many scriptures show that Israel and the
multitudes that populate the millennial earth are still in their natural bodies
until the end of the millennium (Rev 20:7-9). Where then are the glorified
redeemed that were changed at the rapture? How do we understand the difference
between the saints that are changed at the rapture, and those that populate the
millennial earth in their natural bodies? Do they dwell together on the
millennial earth? When will those that come to faith during the millennium be
changed? How are we to understand the nature and purpose of this distinction?
Notice
the contrast. Those that put on immortality and final perfection at the Lord’s
return pass instantly (“in a moment”) into a transcendent state of existence
that beggars description, evoking comparison with angels and stars (Dan 12:3;
Mt 22:30; 1 Cor 15:41). It is a wonderful kind of existence that will enable
the perfected saint to “know even as he is known” (1Cor 13:10-12). In marked
contrast, the surviving remnant of Israel does not receive the transforming
revelation of Christ until the point of His return at the day of the Lord (Isa
66:8; Ezek 39:22; Zech 12:10; Mt 23:39; Rev 1:7).
Many
lines of evidence show that at the same moment that the church is changed and
‘caught up’, the penitent remnant of Israel receives the revelation of their
Messiah (“in one day”). This happens in a way that is best compared to Paul’s
revelation on the Damascus Road. However, rather than rapture, the penitent
remnant of Israel are seen going each one apart to mourn for the great
repentance that has broken upon them at that time. Furthermore, many scriptures
show that the gentiles that are left among the nations volunteer every mode of
transport to assist the Jews in a massive exodus back to the Land (Isa 49:22;
60:9; 66:20). This second exodus (Isa 11:11-13, 14-16; 27:13) is to be
distinguished from an earlier return in unbelief in preparation for the crucible
of the final tribulation (Jer 30:3-7; Ezek 22:19-22; 38:8; Zeph 2:1-2). This
final return begins only after the Antichrist has been destroyed at the day of
the Lord. All of the scriptures depicting the final and complete return (Ezek
39:29) assume the presence of the new heart and Spirit. Then will be brought to
pass the saying that is written:
“Thus
saith the Lord of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men
shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of
the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard
that God is with you” (Zech 8:23).
So
where is the church? Well, by definition, those that are in union with God by
new birth are the body of Christ. “Now the Lord is that Spirit, and he that is
joined to the Lord is one spirit with Him.” Wherever the Spirit indwells,
Christ indwells. This means that the Jews and those that turn to Christ during
the millennium will be no less the body of Christ on earth at that time,
(albeit with some distinctions of function, role, and stewardship suited to
that unique dispensation). Now, since it is clear on the basis of 1Cor 15:50
that no saint can enter final perfection without this ‘change’, we know that
any saint that comes to faith after the rapture must at some point undergo this
change as well. That much is certain. The question becomes, when will
millennial saints be changed? For more reasons than I can enter into here, I
would submit that the best inference is at the end of the millennium.
If Paul had not told
us that "we shall ALL be changed" at the last trump, we might have
supposed that those in Christ that survived the tribulation would simply
proceed into the millennium in their natural bodies
Now
my question does not concern the time that the faithful of both testaments are
raised. As I pointed out, it was no mystery that the Old Testament faithful
would be raised after the tribulation. Nor was it a mystery that the day of the
Lord comes in connection with the sounding of a trumpet. As I said, the primary
focus of the rapture concerned the relationship of departed saints to the
living at Christ’s return. In 1Cor 15:50-54, Paul is interested to show the
change that is necessary for the final perfection of glorified immortality. If Paul
had not told us that “we shall ALL be changed” at the last trump, we might have
supposed that those in Christ that survived the tribulation would simply
proceed into the millennium in their natural bodies along with the redeemed of
Israel and all ‘that are left’ from among the nations. (Isa 24:6; Ezek 36:36;
Zech 14:16).
We
know that there is a surviving remnant of Jews that do not come to faith until
Christ’s return and these do in fact go into the millennium in their natural
bodies. The saved of Israel receive the new heart and the fullness of the
Spirit at the appearing of Christ, but they remain unchanged in the sense of
the final perfection of resurrected glorification. This means that no surviving
believer will go into the millennium unchanged. This is in marked contrast to
the newly saved remnant of Israel that go into the millennium in natural bodies
and they have children born to them. The question is not why believers MUST be
changed. That is clear. But why are they changed at this time? Why don’t
believers that survive the last persecution to the Lord’s coming NOT simply
proceed into the millennium together with the saved remnant of Israel and those
that believe afterward?
Try
to get the picture. Christ has returned; the Antichrist is dead; the tribulation
is over; the Jews are returning from all the lands of their captivity (Isa
11:11-12), and the gentiles are voluntarily assisting in their return. The
penitent remnant of Israel has now received the Holy Spirit by reason of the
revelation that has broken upon their collective understanding (see Isa 44:3;
59:21; Zech 12:10; Ezek 36:26; 37:14; 39:29; Joel 2:29); the face of God is no
longer hidden (Isa 8:14-17; Ezek 39:29); and the Jewish people and their
children after them are ‘all’ holy from that time and forward (Isa 4:2; Isa
59:21; Isa 60:21; Jer 31:34; 32:40; Ezek 39:22-29).
But
here’s the problem. We know that Israel and those that come to faith after the
rapture are not yet changed. In all the prophets they are always depicted as
living in natural bodies, and activities and functions are ascribed to them
that are incompatible with resurrected saints (contrast Ezek 39:11-16 with Mt
22:30; 1 Cor 13:12). So what is the relationship of those in glorified bodies
to those not yet resurrected? See what I mean? Surely we are not to suppose
that these dramatically different kinds of existence will co-habit the
millennial earth and intermix in a physical way. But if not, where are the
glorified saints?
I
believe the reason the godly of this age do not go into the millennium with
those that believe after the rapture is partly because theirs is a different
role and purpose. Remember that those living on this side of the day of the
Lord are under different conditions than those that live on the other side of
Christ’s return. On this side of the Lord’s return, the mystery of God is not
yet finished (Rev 10:7). Satan is not yet bound.
My regeneration came
after an unveiling of my sin, and such revelation is always devastating; and
where there is death of this kind, there is also resurrection.
Notice
that both ends of the millennium are marked by a resurrection, and in each
instance, this high point of apocalyptic (revelatory) transformation is
immediately preceded by an ultimate manifestation of evil. There is something
here of awesome significance. My regeneration came after an unveiling of my
sin, and such revelation is always devastating; and where there is death of
this kind, there is also resurrection. There must be a death before there is
resurrection. All sinners are dead, but they are insensible of their death
until they are made to feel it by the awakening grace of the Spirit.
‘Confidence in the flesh’ is the strength of the veil, and the veil is only
shattered by revelation. But the revelation that finally pierces the veil does
not come apart from crisis, travail, and suffering, as in the crucible of
Jacob’s trouble (Dan 12:7). Even the moment of spiritual regeneration is
preceded by a crisis when our need and helplessness comes home to us by the
convicting power of the Spirit. See the pattern? This pattern was realized in
Isaiah’s vision of the Lord; it was realized in Paul’s divine arrest on the
Damascus Road; and it will be realized in Israel’s transforming vision of
Christ at the end of ‘Jacob’s trouble’ (Jer 30:7 with Zech 12:10). So it is no
accident that two resurrection events that bound both ends of the millennium
are preceded by an ultimate demonstration of evil. Resurrection follows
revelation of what is in man.
So
I suggest that Christ’s appearing accomplishes an Enoch – Elijah-like
translation in those that have been previously prepared by the work of the
Spirit. There is a confluence (coming together) of conditions and redemptive
influences that reach an intensity and a peak in the tribulation that the
prophets compare to the time of travail and transition in child birth. This
suggests to me that the transfiguration of the church at Christ’s appearing is
not incidental, but is the capstone of a process that has reached its goal.
Finally,
I want to point out that there is such a thing as a ‘necessary inference’. Even
though scripture is not explicit that the millennial saints must at some point
be changed, the rule that is established in 1Cor 15:50 makes this an invincible
necessity, hence, a ‘necessary inference’. It is awkward to conceive of the
resurrected and un-resurrected redeemed of all ages dwelling together at once
in the Promised Land, even with its expanded millennial borders. The thought
seems ridiculous. But there is a good and reasonable explanation that
harmonizes the scripture without spiritualizing the plain meaning.
Of
course, unlike replacement theologians, I believe that Paul looked for a future
expression of Christ’s kingdom on this earth beyond this present age (1Cor
15:28). Though John’s revelation of the thousand years would come later into
the canon of revealed truth, Paul shared with many a view of the future that
required an interim of earthly fulfillment beyond the day of the Lord return of
Christ. He would have therefore been keenly aware of our question concerning
the distinction between the resurrected and glorified saints and those dwelling
in mortal bodies. Though not its primary purpose, Paul’s revelation of the
rapture answers the problem. But Jesus had already pointed us in this
direction. In response to demands concerning the nature of the resurrection,
Jesus likens the resurrected redeemed to the angels. This could only mean that
the future life of the resurrection is a new kind of existence, free from the
constraints of the former (Lk 20:35).
Furthermore,
Jesus describes the rewards of the resurrected redeemed in terms of ruling over
cities (Lk 19:17). How do glorified saint rule over earthly cities? I suggest
it is because we are not visible to those living on the millennial earth, but
have been assigned places of rule from heavenly places, invisible to mortal
eyes. At that time, we shall judge angels, and if angels, why not entire
cities? Regardless of our view of the millennium, it is limited. It is not the
final resting place. It has a unique purpose that ends in a final demonstration
of human depravity. The ultimate inheritance of every saint is the “heavenly
city that has foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb 11:10; Rev 21).
In
summary, here are some lines from an earlier response on this topic.
The
translated saints of this dispensation, together with the resurrected saints of
the OT (Is 26:19; Dan 12:2; Jn 11:24), do not so much inherit the Land of
Israel in a physical way, as the enduring city (Heb 11:10) of glorified
immortality, the final perfection (1Cor 13:10, 12). At the rapture, the
redeemed of this dispensation enter the fullness of the kingdom according to
1Cor 15:50. Those that come to faith after the rapture must wait for their
change. Throughout the millennial dispensation, the glorified redeemed will
have positions of rule (“five or ten cities”) over the millennial earth. It is
our belief that the translated and glorified saints of all past ages will
exercise an invisible rule (they shall be “like the angels”). This rule will
evidently be exercised from out of the heavenly places that have been cleared
of the influence of the now evicted principalities and powers. We believe that
all that come to salvation after Christ’s return must also be changed according
to the rule established in 1Cor 15:50. It is best to infer that this change
will come for millennial saints at the ‘second resurrection’. Though the
righteous are not explicitly mentioned in connection with the second
resurrection, this is the most reasonable time to expect the final perfection
for millennial saints, since this is the next great climactic apocalyptic
transformation.
Faithfully
yours, Reggie
Comments
Many evangelicals believe that Christ will "rapture" them to heaven years before the second coming and (most importantly) well BEFORE Antichrist and his "tribulation." But Acts 2:34, 35 reveal that Jesus is at the Father's right hand in heaven until He leaves to destroy His earthly foes at the second coming. And Acts 3:21 says that Jesus “must” stay in heaven with the Father "until the times of restitution of all things” which includes, says Scofield, “the restoration of the theocracy under David’s Son” which obviously can’t begin before or during Antichrist’s reign. ("The Rapture Question," by the long time No. 1 pretrib authority John Walvoord, didn't dare to even list, in its scripture index, the above verses! They were also too hot for John Darby - the so-called "father of dispensationalism" - to list in the scripture index in his "Letters"!)
Paul explains the “times and the seasons” (I Thess. 5:1) of the catching up (I Thess. 4:17) as the “day of the Lord” (5:2) which FOLLOWS the posttrib sun/moon darkening (Matt. 24:29; Acts 2:20) WHEN “sudden destruction” (5:3) of the wicked occurs! The "rest" for "all them that believe" is also tied to such destruction in II Thess. 1:6-10! (If the wicked are destroyed before or during the trib, who'd be left alive to serve the Antichrist?) Paul also ties the change-into-immortality “rapture” (I Cor. 15:52) to the end of trib “death” (15:54). (Will death be ended before or during the trib? Of course not! And vs. 54 is also tied to Isa. 25:8 which Scofield views as Israel's posttrib resurrection!) It's amazing that the Olivet Discourse contains the "great commission" for the church but not even a hint of a pretrib rapture for the church!
Many don't know that before 1830 all Christians had always viewed I Thess. 4’s “catching up” as an integral part of the final second coming to earth. In 1830 this "rapture" was stretched forward and turned into an idolized separate coming of Christ. To further strengthen their novel view, which evangelical scholars overwhelmingly rejected throughout the 1800s, pretrib teachers in the early 1900s began to stretch forward the “day of the Lord” (what Darby and Scofield never dared to do) and hook it up with their already-stretched-forward “rapture.” Many leading evangelical scholars still weren’t convinced of pretrib, so pretrib teachers then began teaching that the “falling away” of II Thess. 2:3 is really a pretrib rapture (the same as saying that the “rapture” in 2:3 must happen before the “rapture” ["gathering"] in 2:1 can happen – the height of desperation!). Google "Walvoord Melts Ice" for more on this.
Other Google articles on the 183-year-old pretrib rapture view include “X-Raying Margaret,” "Margaret Macdonald's Rapture Chart," "Pretrib Rapture's Missing Lines," "Edward Irving is Unnerving," "The Unoriginal John Darby," "Catholics Did NOT Invent the Rapture," "The Real Manuel Lacunza," “Thomas Ice (Bloopers),” “Wily Jeffrey,” “The Rapture Index (Mad Theology),” “America’s Pretrib Rapture Traffickers,” “Roots of (Warlike) Christian Zionism,” “Scholars Weigh My Research,” “Pretrib Hypocrisy,” "Appendix F: Thou Shalt Not Steal," "Pretrib Rapture Secrecy," “Deceiving and Being Deceived,” "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty," "Famous Rapture Watchers," and "Morgan Edwards' Rapture View" – most by the author of the bestselling book “The Rapture Plot” (the most accurate and documented book on pretrib rapture history which is obtainable by calling 800.643.4645).
[Amen, Reggie. Found the above on the web & want to share it. LB.]